Technically, we were still in the planning phase of the A/P audit – but had already identified several areas of risk that needed to be analyzed further.
The early payments represented a potential fraud. If you paid within 15 days, you should receive an early payment discount of between 1.5 -2.5% depending on the vendor’s terms. In addition to reviewing the invoices with ‘immediate’ payment terms, we calculated the difference between the latter of the receipt of goods or invoice received date, and the check date. Then we stratified using intervals of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, 21-25, 26-30, and >30 days. The total number and amount of transactions paid within 15 days was determined. The analysis showed that only 4.6 percent of the transactions were paid within 15 days, however, this represented almost 16 percent of the total payments made.
The auditors review the transactions that were paid within 15 days and found that early payment discounts were claimed in 87% of the cases. A Classify determined that the other invoices were all processed at the same A/P office; belonged to only three vendors; and were processed by two A/P clerks. The unclaimed early payment discounts, calculated at 2%, totaled $832,000.
The team leader had concerns about two possible fraud scenarios. In the first, the A/P clerk processes the original transaction for the full amount of the invoice and subsequently requests a credit from the vendor, for the early payment discount amount, and keeps the credit. The second scheme involves deliberating pay invoices early, without claiming the early payment discount, and receiving a kickback from the vendor.
To identify the first type of fraud, the team leader send out confirmation letters to the three vendors that had been paid early, requesting them to provide details on the terms and amount of the payment. All three vendors replied that they had initially been paid the full amount, but had subsequently sent the company a check for the amount of the discount. The auditors asked the companies for copies of the canceled checks; the two A/P clerks had endorsed them all.
Continue reading Year 12 – 1999 – Part 2 – Drilling down into A/P risks